Tuesday, February 9

Opinion: GAMC fix includes missing pieces

November 11, 2009 by Howie · 1 Comment 

Human rightsOn Friday, the Pawlenty administration announced that people enrolled in GAMC on March 1, 2010 will be automatically transitioned to MinnesotaCare by Minnesota’s Department of Human Services.

Though this is a step in the right direction, there is still a lot of work ahead. Some of the missing pieces of the proposed fix:

. Only people who are enrolled in GAMC on March 1 will be helped. The GAMC population is constantly changing and many thousands will be left behind.

. Uninsured, low-income adults who need treatment due to tramatic injury or acute illness after March 1 will still have to wait weeks or months for coverage, even under MinnesotaCare.

. MinnesotaCare is capped at $10,000. Many GAMC patients have bills much higher than this.

. Everyone who gets enrolled after March 1 will have to pay a MinnesotaCare premium, which is out of reach for many people experiencing homelessness.

. The Health Care Access Fund (which funds MinnesotaCare) is projected to run out of money within a year, which means even more Minnesotans will lose health care coverage unless there’s a legislative fix.

What needs to happen?

Please keep writing and calling your legislators and the Governor’s office. Working together, we will make sure the health care needs of Minnesota’s most vulnerable citizens are taken care of.

If you know anyone in other parts of the state, please ask them to contact their Representative on this issue.

Local representatives:
. Tom Huntley, District 7A | rep.thomas.huntley@house.mn | 651-296-2228
. Roger Reinert, District 7B | rep.roger.reinert@house.mn | 651-296-4246
. Mary Murphy, District 6B | rep.mary.murphy@house.mn | 651-296-2676
. David Dill, District 6A | rep.david.dill@house.mn | 651-296-2190

Popular Posts:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Comments

One Response to “Opinion: GAMC fix includes missing pieces”
  1. Marissa says:

    I’m confused by your headline: “GAMC fix includes missing pieces.”

    Could you explain what that means and how that fits in with your post? I’d say a more appropriate headline would be along the lines of “GAMC unallotment leaves gaps” or “MN Care not a substitute for GAMC.”

    See the following for 2 great articles that talk about the effects of the unallotment and some information on who is on GAMC:
    http://legal-ledger.com/item.cfm?recID=12473
    http://unitedfrontmn.org/2009/11/04/gmac-alliance-issue-part-1-in-our-series

Post a Comment

Post your comment below. To post your photo with your comment, get a gravatar!