Skip to content

Fred Friedman: The worst injustice in Vikings history and it is not even close

"I told (Sid) Hartman that he needed to spend less time fawning over Bobby Knight and George Steinbrenner and more time cashing in favors with his 'close personal friends' and getting (Jim) Marshall inducted. It was rude of me, but I am proud I said it." -- Fred Friedman

Fred Friedman

The article by Craig Peters that Howie ran on September 5 about Vikings captains but really about Jim Marshall was right on. 

The failure of the 50 writers and media types and the NFL Hall of Fame Board of Directors to enshrine Marshall is unjustifiable and a failure of the Minnesota media to successfully lobby for Marshal's induction.

Here is my argument:

1. Third all-time in consecutive NFL starts. The only two ahead of him are punter Jeff Feagles and  quarterback Brett Favre. Neither had to rush or block or tackle.

2. Marshall never missed a playoff game and played in 10.3. He was a long-time team captain who ran the Vikings' locker room for 19 seasons.

4. Modern statistics (devised by people that never played but have math and stats graduate degrees) say he should be in. (See Profootballreference.com and Next generation stats.)

5. Bud Grant spent years lobbying for his inclusion. I'll take Grant's analysis over statistical gurus every day.

6. The three former Vikings Hall of Famers who accomplished the most in their post-playing careers, Supreme Court Justice Alan Page, long-time Twin City educator Randal McDaniel and wealthy businessman Fran Tarkenton all say he should have been voted in long ago. In the late 1980s my friend the late Harvey Solon introduced me to the Strib's Sid Hartman. I told Hartman that he needed to spend less time fawning over Bobby Knight and George Steinbrenner and more time cashing in favors with his 'close personal friends' and getting Marshall inducted. It was rude of me, but I am proud I said it."

Comments

Latest

Howie: Minnesota at the edge of authority

Minnesota’s strength, historically, has been its preference for problem-solving over posturing. That tradition is being tested now. This is not the moment for reflexive outrage or performative reassurance. It is the moment for clarity.

Members Public

Howie: Minnesota has outgrown its stories

Minnesota does not need more outrage. It needs clearer accounting. It needs fewer slogans and more follow-through. It needs to revisit old assumptions with open eyes and accept that a reputation earned decades ago does not guarantee results today.

Members Public

Howie: Something is breaking inside Minnesota’s justice system

Something significant is being examined, something consequential has gone wrong inside the process, and the people most familiar with that process decided they could not continue as if nothing had changed. In federal law enforcement, that is as close to an alarm bell as it gets.

Members Public