Table of Contents
Howie's column is powered by Lyric Kitchen · Bar
Duluth’s rental market isn’t healthy. It’s not “tight,” it’s not “competitive,” and it’s not “vibrant.” It’s running a fever — and everyone trapped inside it, from tenants to landlords to city planners, can feel the heat.
For years, local leaders have pitched housing as the key to growth. Build more units, they say, and the people will come.
But the numbers tell a harder truth: the city’s population has barely budged in 20 years, inching from 86,000 to roughly 88,000 residents. Yet rents are climbing like we’re in Austin or Denver.
The mismatch between supply, affordability, and income has created a pressure cooker where both tenants and landlords are running out of oxygen.
The city’s latest comprehensive housing study — the Maxfield Research 2025 report — lays out the evidence like an autopsy.
The overall rental vacancy rate sits at just 1.8% for market-rate units, and an even more alarming 1.1% for affordable or subsidized units.
Economists say a “healthy” market hovers around 5 to 7 percent vacancy. That means Duluth’s rental pipeline is functionally locked. If you’re a renter, you take what you can find. If you’re a landlord, you’re juggling turnover, repair costs, and delinquency risk while trying to keep a roof patched in a city where 70% of the housing stock was built before 1960.
Average rent in 2025 is roughly $1,443, up nearly 20 percent from pre-pandemic levels. HUD’s official Fair Market Rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Duluth metro is $1,140 — a figure that dictates what Section 8 and other voucher programs will pay. That gap, roughly $300 per month, is a cliff that thousands of lower-income renters are now tumbling over.
About 53% of renters in Duluth are cost-burdened, spending more than 30 percent of income on rent. Nearly 29% are severely cost-burdened, meaning they’re paying more than half. That’s not a statistic; it’s a slow bleed on household stability.
You can see it in the turnover patterns. Renters bounce from one unit to another, chasing a slightly lower rate or escaping an eviction filing.
Landlords feel that churn as a financial and emotional drain — unpaid rent, trashed units, vacant days, and repairs they can’t pass along without losing the next applicant.
The market is full, but it’s not stable. It’s a musical chairs economy built on fear, and when the music stops, the lowest-income residents are the ones left standing.
City leaders keep talking about population growth, as if 2,000 new residents would somehow fix this. But Duluth’s crisis isn’t about headcount; it’s about structure.
The median household income in the city is just $60,169, well below the state average of $84,313. Even middle-income earners are being priced out of neighborhoods they once called home.
The city’s oldest housing stock, concentrated in West Duluth and Lincoln Park, was never designed for today’s energy costs, insurance rates, or maintenance inflation. What was “naturally affordable” a decade ago now bleeds landlords dry.
Meanwhile, the construction pipeline can’t keep pace with need. The 2025 housing study projects Duluth will require 8,713 new units by 2035 to maintain stability — but only a fraction of that pipeline exists.
In 2022, the city added just 167 new multi-family rental units and 34 single-family homes.
Developers are chasing safer returns in senior housing, assisted living, and short-term or medical-adjacent projects near the Essentia campus. Those make financial sense — stable tenants, reliable financing, high per-unit revenue.
But they don’t touch the working-class families and young professionals who keep Duluth functioning.
If the rental fever feels abstract, talk to anyone trying to use a housing voucher. Voucher holders in Duluth routinely wait months to find a willing landlord, and many never do. When they finally secure a lease, they often pay well above their intended share.
HUD’s payment standards haven’t caught up to the market, and landlords are hesitant to take on inspection requirements and delayed payments. So they quietly exit the program. The result: the safety net frays.
Publicly supported renters are spending unsustainable shares of income — sometimes 50 to 60 percent — just to stay sheltered. That’s not a lifestyle. That’s a countdown.
There’s another side to this coin that rarely makes the press. Many small landlords — the backbone of Duluth’s housing supply — are in trouble, too. They face rising property taxes, escalating insurance premiums, and repair costs that outstrip rent growth.
For decades, these “mom and pop” owners filled the city’s gap between subsidized and market-rate housing. They’re the ones renting out duplexes in Endion or upstairs flats in Central Hillside. But the model doesn’t pencil anymore.
Maintenance deferred becomes maintenance denied. When they finally sell, investors buy the buildings, upgrade them, and double the rent. The city loses another rung on its already splintered housing ladder.
So where does this all go? Without intervention, into the ditch. A tight rental market with stagnant incomes is a system that eats its own. The eviction pipeline becomes an eviction carousel.
The dream of moving up — from rental to ownership, from apartment to starter home — becomes a mirage.
And while city hall focuses on population slogans, Duluth risks hollowing out its workforce base: teachers, nurses, restaurant workers, and public employees commuting from Cloquet or Two Harbors because it’s cheaper to live 30 miles away.
But there are solutions, if the city is willing to talk less about growth and more about repair. Start with housing choice vouchers: index them more aggressively to actual market rents.
The Duluth Housing Authority could pilot incentive payments for landlords who accept vouchers or commit to long-term affordability covenants.
Use tax abatements to offset the property-tax squeeze that pushes landlords out.
Expand emergency rental assistance and eviction diversion programs — not as charity, but as market stabilization tools. The new 14-day eviction notice law Minnesota adopted in 2024 helped slow filings statewide. Duluth could build on that momentum with right-to-counsel funding and streamlined mediation services, keeping families housed and properties solvent.
Then, tackle supply strategically. Incentivize what the private market won’t build: workforce housing at 60 to 80 percent of area median income. That’s the invisible middle where teachers and paramedics live.
The city can use its bonding authority and TIF to subsidize construction costs for developers who lock in real affordability — not just lip service “below market” rates that still run $1,700 a month.
State tools exist: the Housing Infrastructure Bonds and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) that have financed much of Minnesota’s affordable stock. Pair them with local fee waivers and a “fast-track” permitting lane for projects that meet affordability thresholds.
Equally vital: protect what’s already here. Create a rehabilitation grant pool for small landlords who agree to maintain affordability for 10 years.
Encourage limited-equity co-ops or community land trusts to keep naturally affordable buildings out of speculative cycles. Let local lenders pilot rehab loans for aging duplexes at 2% interest, backed by city guarantees. Every time a 1920s triplex stays viable, that’s three families who don’t have to beg for space in a brand-new luxury box.
None of this makes headlines. It’s not ribbon-cutting policy. It’s grind-level work — the kind of disciplined, unsexy local governance that wins cities their futures back. And it’s exactly what Duluth needs right now.
The story of Duluth’s housing crisis is not that we failed to grow fast enough. It’s that we forgot how to build stability.
A city’s health isn’t measured by population spikes or press releases. It’s measured by whether the people who teach your kids, clean your clinics, plow your streets, and serve your coffee can afford to live within its limits.
On that metric, Duluth is sick. The cure will take years, patience, and the courage to prioritize results over rhetoric.
But it’s possible. The fever can break. The question is whether anyone at city hall — or in St. Paul — has the will to treat the symptoms before the patient collapses.
